• Uncle@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    well, to be fair, we can see the same amount of stuff in every direction without an edge. and at the rate of expansion, we could never reach the ‘edge’ we can currently see. so we kinda are at the centre of the universe

    • Takapapatapaka@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I think the problematic part of heliocentrism geocentrism is more “the sun is rotating around the earth” rather than “we are at the center of universe”

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        heliocentrism is not about the sun rotating around the earth. The heliocentric model puts the sun at the center, and everything rotating around it.

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Yeah, the whole Flat Earth stuff is a relative modern re-occurrence.

    We’ve had concrete evidence of a globe Earth and a pretty accurate measurement of the circumference since the 3rd century BC (Erastothenes). ¹
    Heliocentrism was theorized by the Ancient Greeks, but we’ve only had concrete evidence/math since the 16th century (Copernicus). ²

    Then in the 19th century, you had the writer Washington Irving who wrote a romanticized biography of Columbus and claimed that folks in the Middle Ages believed the Earth to be flat, which was just not true. ³

    And then there was Samuel Rowbotham, another writer who just made up a whole load of bullshit and kind of brought the conspiracy theories underway. ⁴

    ¹: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_Earth
    ²: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliocentrism
    ³: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myth_of_the_flat_Earth#Irving’s_biography_of_Columbus
    ⁴: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Rowbotham