• wicked_observer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Nice data but I stick with Toshiba old HGST and WD. For me they seem to last much longer than Seagate

    • BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I have one Seagate drive. It’s a 500 GB that came in my 2006 Dell Dimension E510 running XP Media Center. When that died in 2011, I put it in my custom build. It ran until probably 2014, when suddenly I was having issues booting and I got a fresh WD 1 TB. Put it in a box, and kept it for some reason. Fast forward to 2022, I got another Dell E510 with only an 80 GB. Dusted off the old 500 GB and popped it in. Back with XP Media Center. The cycle is complete. That drive is still noisy as fuck.

    • Steak@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Not worth the risk for me to find out lol. My granddaddy stored his data on WD drives and his daddy before him, and my daddy after him. Now I store my data on WD drives and my son will to one day. Such is life.

      • kalpol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        And here I am with HGST drives hitting 50k hours

        Edit: no one ever discusses the Backblaze reliability statistics. Its interesting to see how they stack up against the anecdotes.

    • HouseWolf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      My personal experience has been hit n miss.

      Was using one 4TB Seagate for 11 years then bought a newer model to replace it since I thought it was gonna die any day. That new one died within 6 months. The old one still works although I don’t use it for for anything important now.

  • corroded@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    9 days ago

    I can’t wait for datacenters to decommission these so I can actually afford an array of them on the second-hand market.

  • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 days ago

    30/32 = 0.938

    That’s less than a single terabyte. I have a microSD card bigger than that!

    ;)

  • Zacryon@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Seagate. The company that sold me an HDD which broke down two days after the warranty expired.

    No thanks.
    laughing in Western Digital HDD running for about 10 years now

    • satans_methpipe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Funny because I have a box of Seagate consumer drives recovered from systems going to recycling that just won’t quit. And my experience with WD drives is the same as your experience with Seagate.

      Edit: now that I think about it, my WD experience is from many years ago. But the Seagate drives I have are not new either.

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Survivorship bias. Obviously the ones that survived their users long enough to go to recycling would last longer than those that crap out right away and need to be replaced before the end of the life of the whole system.

        I mean, obviously the whole thing is biased, if objective stats state that neither is particularly more prone to failure than the other, it’s just people who used a different brand once and had it fail. Which happens sometimes.

        • satans_methpipe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Ah I wasn’t thinking about that. I got the scrappy spinny bois.

          I’m fairly sure me and my friends had a bad batch of Western digitals too.

    • turmacar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Had the same experience and opinion for years, they do fine on Backblaze’s drive stats but don’t know that I’ll ever super trust them just 'cus.

      That said, the current home server has a mix of drives from different manufacturers including seagate to hopefully mitigate the chances that more than one fails at a time.

  • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Everybody taking shit about Seagate here. Meanwhile I’ve never had a hard drive die on me. Eventually the capacity just became too little to keep around and I got bigger ones.

    Oldest I’m using right now is a decade old, Seagate. Actually, all the HDDs are Seagate. The SSDs are Samsung. Granted, my OS is on an SSD, as well as my most used things, so the HDDs don’t actually get hit all that much.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      I’ve had a Samsung SSD die on me, I’ve had many WD drives die on me (also the last drive I’ve had die was a WD drive), I’ve had many Seagate drives die on me.

      Buy enough drives, have them for a long enough time, and they will die.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 days ago

      Seagate had some bad luck with their 3TB drives about 15 years ago now if memory serves me correctly.

      Since then Western Digital (the only other remaining HDD manufacturer) pulled some shenanigans with not correctly labeling different technologies in use on their NAS drives that directly impacted their practicality and performance in NAS applications (the performance issues were particularly agregious when used in a zfs pool)

      So basically pick your poison. Hard to predict which of the duopoly will do something unworthy of trusting your data upon, so uh…check your backups I guess?

  • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Avoid these like the plague. I made the mistake of buying 2 16 TB Exos drives a couple years ago and have had to RMA them 3 times already.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      I stopped buying seagates when I had 4 of their 2TB barracuda drives die within 6 months… constantly was RMAing them. Finally got pissed and sold them and bought WD reds, still got 2 of the reds in my Nas Playing hot backups with nearly 8 years of power time.

      • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        They seem to be real hit or miss. I also have 2 6TB barracudas that have 70,000 power on hours (8 yrs) that are still going fine.

        • john89@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          “Hit or miss” is unfortunately not good enough for consumer electronics.

          It means you’re essentially gambling with bad odds so the business you’re giving money to can get away with cutting corners.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Nice, I agree, I’m sure there is an opposite of me, telling their story of a bunch of failed WD drives and having swore them off.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        I recently had to send back a Barracuda drive as well. I’m seeing if the Ironwolf drive fares any better.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          I have heard good things about their ironwolf drives, but that’s a enterprise solution drive, so hopefully it’s worth it

    • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Had that issue with the 3tb drives. Bought 4, had to RMA all 4, and then RMA 2 of the replacement drives all within a few months.

      The last 2 are still operating 10 years later though. 2 out of 6.

  • veee@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Just one would be a great backup, but I’m not ready to run a server with 30TB drives.

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 days ago

      I’m here for it. The 8 disc server is normally a great form factor for size, data density and redundancy with raid6/raidz2.

      This would net around 180TB in that form factor. Thats would go a long way for a long while.

  • Avieshek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    How can someone without programming skills make a cloud server at home for cheap?

    Lemmy’s Spoiler Doesn’t Make Sense

    (Like connected to WiFi and that’s it)

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 days ago

    I thought I read somewhere that larger drives had a higher chance of failure. Quick look around and that seems to be untrue relative to newer drives.

  • JakenVeina@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    The two models, […] each offer a minimum of 3TB per disk

    Huh? The hell is this supposed to mean? Are they talking about the internal platters?