A bipartisan group of 12 senators has urged the Transportation Security Administration’s inspector general to investigate the agency’s use of facial recognition, saying it poses a significant threat to privacy and civil liberties.

“This technology will soon be in use at hundreds of major and mid-size airports without an independent evaluation of the technology’s precision or an audit of whether there are sufficient safeguards in place to protect passenger privacy,” the senators wrote.

“While the TSA claims facial recognition is optional, it is confusing and intimidating to opt out of TSA’s facial recognition scans, and our offices have received numerous anecdotal reports of Transportation Security Officers (TSOs) becoming belligerent when a traveler askes to opt out, or simply being unaware of that right,” the senators wrote. They added that in some airports the signage instructing flyers to step in front of a camera is prominently displayed while signs advising passengers of their right to opt out of face scan is “strategically placed in inconspicuous locations.”

To opt out of a face scan at an airport, a traveler need only say that they decline facial recognition. They can then proceed normally through security by presenting an identification document, such as a driver’s license or passport.

  • xodoh74984@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    I’m very pro privacy, but I’m just going to say out loud that it’s not like US state and federal governments don’t already have photos of your face that can be used to track you. The alternative is to hand over your ID, the thing the government printed after capturing and storing a picture of your face.

    My pitchforks are saved for companies that track your location and interactions using facial recognition combined with social media posts. Or CCTV, of course.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      I’m very pro privacy, but I’m just going to say out loud that it’s not like US state and federal governments don’t already have photos of your face that can be used to track you. The alternative is to hand over your ID, the thing the government printed after capturing and storing a picture of your face.

      Did you know the TSA is a public branch of defense that sits between the DOD and the NSA?

      I bet you didn’t know that whatever data the TSA collects they can sell to corporations and back to the government for “validations”.

      the key is corporations can buy your private data from the government.

      so yeah, this is a HUGE privacy issue.

    • Beej Jorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      29 days ago

      Also pro-privacy, here. I was unable to get a good answer on this on HN. It seems to me that replacing a human entering data into a computer at the checkpoint with a computer entering data into a computer at the checkpoint wasn’t much of a change. The whole checkpoint area is already bristling with cameras, as well.

  • Player2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    29 days ago

    Last time I refused it the agent was completely confused and dumbfounded despite having a sign saying it’s optional right next to them

  • NABDad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    If only there was some government organization in place that could propose and pass legislation to limit the TSA.

  • snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    They put up signs that the scan will be deleted after verification, but I am guessing that is a misdirection and a hash of the scan is saved like how fingerprint scanners work. Otherwise there would be no need for the scanners since a person is there to verify the scan already…

  • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    28 days ago

    A bipartisan group of 12 senators has urged the Transportation Security Administration’s inspector general to investigate the agency’s use of facial recognition, saying it poses a significant threat to privacy and civil liberties.

    To which the TSA probably said, “Well, duh!”

  • ATDA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    28 days ago

    Does opting out do anything practical when you’re walking through a an airport with enough cameras to determine how many times you’ve farted in terminal A?

    Not that I disagree with the premise but …

  • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    I opt out aggressively, but they make it so hard. Once I even approached the agent and the camera was directly already in my face, so I hold my hand up to try to block it and say, “I don’t want this,” but apparently they had already gotten my image before I blocked the camera and the TSA agent said “well, you’re verified.” So much for opting out.

    Another time, I was going on an international flight. At the gate, the airline is scanning everyone’s face. I quickly searched the internet about it and found some Reddit post indicating it’s not mandatory at all, but sure enough they’re treating it like it is. When I get to the front, I tell the guy, “I’m not doing this.” And he says “Well, it’s the only way to get on the plane!” I continue to protest citing their privacy policy, which I had learned about moments before. He kinda scoffs and waves me over the to gate desk.

    I walk past him and to the gate lady, she checks my passport and hands me a paper boarding pass. I already had a boarding pass on my phone, but ok. Well, then I walk past the guy who was scanning faces to board the plane and he doesn’t pay any attention to me. I realize then that I could’ve skipped talking to the gate agent all together and just boarded. Wow, these biometrics are so secure! That said, everyone else in line just did as they were asked like a bunch of sheep, some even smiling for the camera while their biometrics were harvested.

    • fireweed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      29 days ago

      Wear a face mask at the airport, and you’ll never get a surprise facial recognition photo again.

      • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        29 days ago

        TSA Clear verifies by your eyes. Covering your nose and mouth won’t be sufficient for long, if it even still is

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    Got a lot of attitude when telling them I preferred to opt out. Signs posted everywhere informing you of the right and the agent felt so put upon when asked. To the point that I mentioned to supervisor and she tried to over apologize like she cares and was going to talk to the agent, but she didn’t give a shit. It’s an intimidation/peer pressure thing, also they do scan your face, and then you can ask them to discard after the fact… But how many of us think that data is actually “gone” after they’ve collected it?

    More likely you still have a scan somewhere in system, now just with an added flag labeling you as a difficult

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      28 days ago

      When I opt out, they keep telling me “we delete the photo after you leave.” Are you deleting the data of my face though? Fuck off with that noise, I ain’t fuckin fallin for it

    • Brodysseus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      That sucks. I’ve never had an issue opting out after finding out it’s possible, maybe done it 7 or 8 times. I smile and ask “is it possible to opt out of that?”

      I’m curious if something would happen if they told you no, when you do in fact have that right. I’m so anxious when I’m there (about nothing, just an anxious guy) that if they told me I couldn’t opt out I’d just fall in and let the thing scan me.

  • futatorius@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    And now scum like Trump are in control of the TSA. We should have shut it down when we had the chance.

  • slaacaa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    29 days ago

    I e.g. some EU airports, you have separate lines for passport check by an officer, and lines for passport & face scan machines. This way you can choose which one to use, when you enter/exit the EU.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    Not that guy! That’s Saddam Hussein! Her him!

    Oh shit, sir, we’re really sorry! Didn’t know Saddam was already in the country! Here’s a complimentary peanut.

  • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    Is this a requirement for domestic flights? In Texas they have these things but nobody uses them.