for me it was back in 2012 i think

  • myplacedk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Oooh yeah, ISDN. My cable solution that I got in year 2000 (to answer OP’s question) didn’t work very well, and DSL wasn’t an option yet I think.

    For those ready to listen to my nostalgia:

    ISDN was awesome because even the smallest solution had two channels. So two phonecalls on one line. Great for businesses. Also, a channel had 64 kbit, slightly faster than the analog modems which I think maxed out at 54 kbit, which was often unlikely to be reached.

    But the trick is, the two channels could be combined to 128 kbit. An incoming or outgoing phonecall would simply reduce the speed back to 64, instead of interrupting the connection.

    Although I paid by the minute, and using two channels doubled the cost, so I usually only used it when I was literally waiting for a data transfer and would be paying the same price anyway.

    Actually, I think my ISDN would count as dial-up, as I paid by the minute.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I don’t know how much it costs. I remember being shocked at the price but the company was willing to pay, so great. At the time, there weren’t too many people able to work from home

      • myplacedk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The price wasn’t too bad for me. I didn’t have a very high income, but I paid for my ISDN myself.

        But I do remember the improvement after switching to DSL, even if this was the early days of DSL that didn’t work thaaat great, it was still way better than analog modem or ISDN.