• Godort@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    The soctatic method. It forces people to actually think about their position in an argument

    • iltoroargento@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t like the Socratic method as it is employed in classrooms. I think the method of questioning is fine, and dissecting a subject can be fun with the right group and foreknowledge, but most instructors absolutely suck at making sure all students are up to speed with whatever is being discussed.

      I don’t see its value as a teaching tool without a strong enough instructor to prepare the students for its use and to guide the discussions in a productive manner.

      Every professor I’ve ever had who used this method basically wasted class time with fill in the blank response questions. These are not higher order thinking discussions and do nothing to actually broaden understanding of whichever subject is being discussed. It seems like a cop out for the professor to me, at least how I’ve seen it used in multiple major universities.

      I’ve had better Socratic discussions while high as fuck with my buddies after class than when we were actually in the lecture hall.

        • iltoroargento@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Lol no. These guys were tenured professors doing the same shit for years. It’s a systemic issue where they rely on a definition of the “Socratic method” that is completely divorced from the original and functional tool. It’s a buzz word they’ve been misinterpreting for over a century.