• Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The thing is, you can be full of rage and still be against violence. Expressing rage doesn’t have to be violent. People express rage in all sorts of non-violent ways, like writing or painting or sculpting.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        What are you even talking about? Are you under the impression that the only way to take action is through losing your mind and raging?

        Controlling your rage allows you to act rationally.

        • cowardsgfy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          i’m not talking about rage, although i do think anger is a great motivator. i’m talking about calm, rational use of violence as a means to an end.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Yeah, you’re right. What did non-violent resistance ever achieve other than liberate India, give people of color in the U.S. civil rights, free the Baltic states from the Soviet Union, end one-party rule in Czechoslovakia, topple the former Ukrainian regime and other things I could probably come up with if you gave me time?

            • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              So, I’m going to suggest India was actually more complicated.

              It was non-violent, but with a strong threat that ‘you can’t keep us, China went red, Russia will help us too’.

              Gandhi’s pacifism was the face the British put on it to make it look less like they’d been beaten by communism (the congress party was vaguely socialist , but mostly in name only, far less so than other, more hindu parties, it stood for corruption more than anything really).

              Also the partition guaranteed neither country would be a major international concern for decades, as they’d be too busy dealing with each other.

              You can say a lot about the British, but they were great at IR.

    • Curiousfur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      My biggest weakness and most toxic trait is wanting to see bad people face consequences. That person weaving through traffic at high speeds without a turn signal, with no concern for the safety of everybody else on the road? Please drive off the road, crash, do something that drives home how selfish you are acting, and I hope it’s expensive.

      Politician campaigning on hate and saying that religion punishes ‘wicked’ people? I hope a loved one suffers some horrible disease and dies in pain.

      Vote for an anti-abortion law? Watch your wife or daughter die of something entirely preventable. Refuse to provide exceptions for rape? Do unto others and all that, you know?

      Nazi/christofascist/white supremacist? Worm food. Slowly.

      I fix things, that’s my whole driving purpose in life, and basically the only thing I’m particularly good at. I have never been very creative, I suck at writing , I’m not a great artist or sculptor or musician. It causes me so much pain and frustration to not be able to fix something, and so much rage to see people deliberately breaking things, doubly so when they delight in the suffering it causes.