• mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 days ago

    If you post censored shit I’m going to PM you shittingdicknipples and lemonparty.

    /shakes tiny fist wistfully

  • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    Mine has also been up to the wrist in vagina, with moderate colon (limited to the digits). I let people know this before they shake my hand, in the spirit of transparency.

  • growsomethinggood ()@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    Counterpoint: a greater number have touched a vagina (but that framing doesn’t obsess over a woman’s sexual purity, so, clearly less important)

    • Mickey7@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      It has to vary from person to person but I’ve never seen a sexual guide that discusses how deep in inches the canal is

  • Mickey7@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    8 days ago

    Never thought about it but obviously everyman has had a dick in his hand for obvious reasons. And all females old enough for sexual interactions have had one in their hand. This is now stuck in my head. The next time I shake the hand of a woman I am going to wonder how many dicks she has had in that hand.

    • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      Gonna has to go piece by piece through this:

      obviously everyman has had a dick in his hand for obvious reasons.

      This line is trans-exclusive, which would probably be given a pass by all but the most ardent trans-inclusive commenters, but still not great.

      And all females

      Dude. There are some times when an argument is made that saying “females” is not inherently objectifying, especially in a scientific, military, or other setting where people are categorized that way, with the significant difference being consistency (e.g. man/woman, male/female, etc). Using one then the other strips all that away and makes it seem like referring to women as “females” is just your normal tendency, which strongly suggests the objectifying behavior.

      And all females old enough for sexual interactions have had one in their hand.

      This is just obviously wrong, as plenty of lesbians, asexual people, or those with lack of access to sexual connections with others have not had a dick in their hands, and that is not an insignificant percentage of women, I’d imagine.

      The next time I shake the hand of a woman I am going to wonder how many dicks she has had in that hand.

      As if to underline the “females” comment, it’s pretty telling that you feel it worth mentioning that you’re going to wonder how many dicks were in the hands of women, but not men (especially funny since any man you meet has most likely had a dick in his hand more recently than a woman).

      Sometimes it is difficult to notice your own biases, so I hope this makes you think about what leads you toward thinking like this, and just general self-reflection.

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      Men/Women Male/Female

      Those are the pairings you wanted. But, for fun, try swapping them next time and see what kind of attitude folks get.

      Male/Women

      Do it. Rustle some jimmies.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      LOL. The politically correct police are on your ass tonight!

      I cannot believe the seriousness of these replies. What is it the kids say? “Touch grass”?

      • Mickey7@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        It is amazing how so many people cannot simply joke around. Politics so consume their lives every single thing in life is viewed only in that context. And not only cannot they not simply joke around they are on a mission to impose their views on anyone who disagrees with them. What a sad way to go through life. Social media in general is all a joke. And this group specifically is all about just getting a laugh.