Canada has implemented a new tax savings from December to February for some things like taxable groceries, crafts, and gaming physical media. I wanted to get a new Xbox controller and found the best price at Walmart for $55 a week ago. The tax holiday starts today and I now see that the $55 has increased to $62 and change, which is about how much tax I should be saving. Great to see this thinly veiled attempt to help Canadians ( /s - win votes) is just going to be extra profit in the corporations’ pockets.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    13 days ago

    Reminds me when Alberta reduced the tax on gas, and within a few weeks consumers were paying the same amount again

    • Chip_Rat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      12 days ago

      Ontario did this too. Took a few weeks tops, and now we pay the same as we always have, except none of the money goes to our roads, just to big oil.

      Thanks Ford.

      • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 days ago

        I laugh because he keeps extending it too and I sure and shit bet he will extend it again so the next government to come in has a poison pill in killing his gas rebate effectively raising the price of gas drastically overnight.

        This is 100% intentional by the OPC. Bunch of fuckwits.

    • Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      13 days ago

      Betcha you get reminded again when Canada sweeps the cons in because cArBOn tax and then we pay the same by Monday for everything.

    • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 days ago

      In Italy when the government reduced vat on ebooks from 22% to 4% not a single publisher passed the savings to the customer and they even increased the prices

    • nexusband@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      12 days ago

      Name one. Price hikes are not illegal in any country in Europe. Changing prices after selling and other shady stuff is illegal in most European countries on the other hand, but this is not it. If the 55 were on sale before, a “sale” price can be axed as most see fit. This screams coincidence and bad luck to me.

      • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        It should be illegal for any store to increase prices by more than 0.5% per month for any product in my opinion.

        Even if massive inflation hits they can still increase prices by 6% after a year, but they at least won’t be able to immediately increase prices by 10-20% after taxes are lessened or a month before a sale is supposed to start.

        • wolfpack86@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 days ago

          All this will do is create a black market full of scalpers who are incentivized to buy the entire stock of a good if the market is willing to pay significantly more.

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    13 days ago

    Well the debate should be over whether the taxes cause things to be expensive or it’s corporate greed causing things to be expensive.

    Next time you see one of the ubiquitous Poilievre ads claiming it’s taxes that’s making things unaffordable, think about where the problems actually are.

  • Windex007@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    13 days ago

    Might be betraying my age here, but do you remember when GST was 7%? EXACTLY the same thing happened.

    GST breaks strictly pad the revenues of business AT THE COST of funds to the public purse. Does a fat fucking zero to the wallets of consumers.

  • Kichae@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    12 days ago

    Seems like an opportunity to use this in attack PP’s tax-cut rhetoric, and to attack the oft-repeated talking points from business that tax increases will be passed on to consumers.

    Tax cuts are eaten by businesses, so long as the businesses believe that people will continue to buy. Tax increases will also be eaten by businesses, so long as the businesses believe that people will refuse to buy at a higher price. It’s all being taken by or from shareholders.

    It’s a shame no political entities will actually touch this with anything more pointed or useful than “that’s appalling!”

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    12 days ago

    I think the answer here is to buy that somewhere other than WalMart. Are there any stores nearby that didn’t increase their price on the controller?

    • Vinny_93@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      13 days ago

      It has been ruled illegal in the Netherlands only last year but companies still do it and het away with it.

    • eezeebee@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      13 days ago

      It was so hastily-implemented that I think it’s either an oversight or by design.

  • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    All prices are set based on what consumers are willing to pay.

    The only way prices ever go down is by exercising a decision not to buy something or to go somewhere for an item.

    It will not come from the government, unless the government mandates a specific rate.

    • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      13 days ago

      They could also provide the cheaper alternative, generating revenue for the government, providing goods at a discount and forcing corporations to match prices.

      Like that’ll happen, though.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      This is why sales tax is silly unless it’s purposefully punitive. Like with cigarettes.

      If they want to give back to consumers, then literally give money to consumers.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      Well the government can break up corporations which results in more competition. They can also enforce standards which also allows more competition. This gives people more options so they can’t just set prices in a monopolistic way.

      Unfortunately there’s not much the Canadian government can do about Walmart and Microsoft as they aren’t Canadian companies. And Kamala’s opportunity economy has been cancelled so it doesn’t look there’s going to be any positive change in the US for foreseeable future.

      But they could break up Loblaw’s at least.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        13 days ago

        They can absolutely tell Walmart they have to reduce their footprint or break up in Canada. They don’t lose their sovereignty just because it’s an American Corporation. If they think Walmart is using global profits to unduly influence Canadian markets they can introduce a tax or even ban them.

  • vortic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    13 days ago

    I don’t say any of this to say that I think what Walmart is doing here is ethical, onky to say that it is logical from their standpoint if they assume there won’t be any blowback.

    Companies charge what they think they can get for a product. The tax is part of the price. If they think an item will sell for $5.26 including tax, it is reasonable for them to think it will still sell for $5.26 if the item isn’t taxed.

    That isn’t to say this is nice on their part, but the current system doesn’t incentivise them to be nice. It incentivises profit.

    It does seem like they took the easy route to gain more profit. It is likely that, in the a absence of tax, their profit would be maximized by a price that is somewhere between the old pre-tax price and the old post-tax price.

    • eezeebee@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      13 days ago

      Yeah, I shouldn’t have been surprised. This is normal psychopathic behaviour for a corporation.

    • CascadianGiraffe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Working behind the scenes with retail pricing (not Walmart) I can say this is 100% how it works.

      Also have been given a sheet listing all of my department’s products that were below a specific profit margin. Told that we had a sale coming in 2 weeks so make sure to raise prices on those before then so that I didn’t have a drop in my overall department sales. If the customers noticed and asked, we were to inform them the ‘sale’ was to offset the price hike that just happened because we were looking out for them.

      • Flatfire@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        12 days ago

        No, but Best Buy does. As does Canada Computers, Shoppers Drug Mart, Gamestop, etc. none of which are as bizzarely aggressive about nonsensical pricing schemes.

    • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      The time that product spends on the shelves of a Canadian Tire is just a layover before its permanent move to a landfill. They are Coors quality at Heineken prices.

  • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 days ago

    This is exactly what the “Taxation is theft” morons don’t understand. They think if the government no longer takes their cut, everybody will just have X amount of money more, and the market won’t just swallow that up without giving you a single thing in return.

    • Pavel Chichikov@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 days ago

      that’s the thing that pisses me off: the tax often increases the perception of how much people are willing to spend. even if you remove or decrease the tax, the companies just inflate the price to fatten their margins. Rule #1 of capitalism: the consumer always loses.