• BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    24 days ago

    Hahaha, they’re just now noticing? Rich.

    And how will Bkuesky be any different? It won’t.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      You’re measuring Bluesky with a different measuring stick than they are.

      You’re measuring it with the “This is decentralized, and therefore not connected to corporate interests, and never can be” stick.

      These journalists WORK FOR the corporate interests you left twitter (or maybe never had an account) over. They are measuring the stick by “These current users are just MAGA users in a cult”.

      As long as Bluesky doesn’t start shifting right wing MAGA, it IS different for their purposes. It’s just their purposes are not YOUR purposes, and therefore they can still say that it’s different, and not have that be a lie. Doesn’t mean it’ll satisfy you any.

    • realitista@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      24 days ago

      Bluesky has far more robust tools for blocking bad actors. You can subscribe to auto updating block lists which take these people off your feed.

    • Bogasse@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      Maybe the goal is to get Musk to buy Bluesky and start all over again 🤷