• TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Idk. I posted this piece from Medhi where he interviews Micheal Moore, which if you want to get a read on MI, thats your guy.

    https://lemmy.world/post/21487386

    The consensus I got from those two is that MI is lost for Harris since she didn’t/ isn’t going to pivot. I know we’re seeing other data on women voters, but like, I don’t see a path to the WH without Michigan for Harris. I just can’t imagine how she could lose MI, but keep WI and PA, AND THEN ALSO pick up NC or GA or some other sunbelt state.

    Its just very very difficult for me to imaging losing MI but picking up somewhere else. MI should be in the bag, incontestable.

    • Sundial@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Thanks for the read. I’ll take a look at it when I get the chance.

      MI should be in the bag, incontestable.

      Yeah it should have been but the Democrats, and Harris, royally fucked this up with all that they’ve done and supported the past 13 months of this conflict. Trump going to Dearborn just goes to show how close it is to turning red.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        The fuck are we gonna do at this point. The only possible saving grace is a literal tsunami of women voters. Harris really needed to be sweeping/ taking at least 5-7 of the swing states, to keep this thing out of the hands of the supreme court. That seems like an impossibility at this point.