• ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      18 hours ago

      For low res, no.

      Hi res, sure. Make it optional, or let players download the region they like. Or just the airports with much lower res landscapes, etc etc.

      Or just, let them have it all and make these choices. Memory is CHEAP nowadays. If you’re a flight sim enthusiast, a few terabytes for the map data is the least expensive part of your setup by far.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Supposedly, the full map is measured in petabytes.

        This is actually a perfectly reasonable use of streaming assets for full-resolution, since almost no players will ever experience even 1 percent of the map.

      • n1ckn4m3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Precisely this – I don’t remember anyone complaining that the FS2020 install size was too large, even if its install size was the butt of a few good-natured jokes. They’ve solved a problem that didn’t exist and in doing so have turned FS into an always online internet-connected live service instead of a game. I’m not touching this game with a 40 foot aileron until an offline mode of some quality exists.

          • n1ckn4m3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Sure, but it had an offline mode and had a base level globe that was downloaded when the game was installed that you could use immediately and didn’t require live cloud connectivity in order for basic functionality to work. Additionally, it allowed you to pre-download large chunks of high detailed land for offline use as well.