Pretty much the title. I certainly believe Trump, Maga, the Military, and the Police will, sooner or later, probably sooner, get around to at least attempting to deanonymize and round up online antifascists and leftists and imprison them. How organized and effective that attempt is I am less sure of.

To be very transparent, this is something I’m pretty sure I’d be on the hook for. I have a long log of anti trump, antifascist, left sentiments, and am 75% sure I’ll be disappeared at some point in the next 4 years as I have no plans of shutting up. The only reason I’m not 100% sure is because of how expensive it would be. But hey, maybe it’s less expensive than potentially losing power? So I don’t know.

Never? Not likely? Maybe? Very? Extremely? Definitely?

Thoughts?

  • wuphysics87@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Given the majority of the supreme court are constitutional literalists, I’m going to stake a claim on very unlikely. That is literally against the first amendment.

    Now, let’s say we live in some kind of bizaro land where you can be taken to court without the protection of the first amendment. (Difficult ti believe I know). You would still, hopefully, have a right to an attorney. If your case is high profile, or you have enough money, an organization like the aclu would help.

  • Atlas_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    For people organizing protests and taking part in them, Maybe to Likely.

    For people just posting things online, Very unlikely. They’ll have their hands full with all the immigrants and protesters first, and there’s far too many people who have said something leftist online.

  • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Unless you’re doing actual organizing, unlikely. The DNC isn’t friendly towards Leftist orgs either, though MAGA groups themselves may become more millitant.

  • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Not likely. Trump doesn’t even know what those words mean. Temporarily jailing them and protesters is likely a different story, though.

  • Sleazy_Albanese [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    get around to at least attempting to deanonymize and round up online antifascists

    They already know exactly who you are. People dont understand how pervasive online surveilance and profiling is. AI makes it simple to compile dossiers on everyone.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      And absolutely all of the roadblocks, legal restrictions, grownups pushing back, worry over public sentiment, etc have been eliminated. Expect it to be much, much worse than you thought.

      Any comparison to what has happened in the past is out the window.

  • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Online? No. Online disorganized leftists aren’t actually leftists, they’re leftist sympathizers. You need to be in a leftist org to actually be a leftist.

    You’re not a threat unless you’re actually doing stuff.

  • Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I don’t think it’s very likely. Even if it was even remotely affordable or feasible he actually needs opposition to define himself and his base ‘ruggedly independent’ and as ‘freedom fighters’.

    If he’s going to go after anyone at all I think it will be high profile people for maximum media impact.

  • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I don’t think it’s “Trump” thing, but the USA will probably start arresting people for the media they consume if a rapidly growing and sufficiently large portion of their citizenry spread and consume messaging they disagree with. It’ll be a side-effect of losing the narrative war. I don’t foresee it happening in the next 4 years.

    I don’t see the point in publicising it. From a PR perspective, “Posted illegal content using a platform frequented by terrorists” is less likely to meet resistance than “Commented🔻on Instagram”. In fact, USA propaganda is already full of vagueties about people’s online behaviour today. Usually in the form of reporting on foreign (enemy) policing as “Helpless teen (19) arrested (fined) for Tweet (Bomb-threat to head of state)”.

    • finderscult@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Suspicion of terrorism, or nothing at all. If the libs are right they wouldn’t care about charges anymore. But since libs are so rarely correct, the government can hold you for 72 hours without charge and the patriot act has a whole list of charges that require no evidence for an arrest. Also statistically you live within 100 miles of a US border if you’re in the US, meaning border patrol can arrest you for any reason or no reason indefinitely.