OK, its just a deer, but the future is clear. These things are going to start kill people left and right.

How many kids is Elon going to kill before we shut him down? Whats the number of children we’re going to allow Elon to murder every year?

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    If you want to motivate people to action, frame it in terms of the property damage they’ll experience to their car when it hits a child. We’ve already seen how far the American public is willing to go for children’s lives, and it’s not very far at all.

  • Hubi@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    The poster, who pays Tesla CEO Elon Musk for a subscription to the increasingly far-right social media site, claimed that the FSD software “works awesome” and that a deer in the road is an “edge case.” One might argue that edge cases are actually very important parts of any claimed autonomy suite, given how drivers check out when they feel the car is doing the work, but this owner remains “insanely grateful” to Tesla regardless.

    How are these people always such pathetic suckers.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d go even farther and say most driving is an edge case. I used 30 day trial of full self-driving and the results were eye opening. Not how it did: it was pretty much as expected, but looking at where it went wrong.

      Full self driving did very well in “normal” cases, but I never realized just how much of driving was an “edge” case. Lane markers faded? No road edge but the ditch? Construction? Pothole? Debris? Other car does something they shouldn’t have? Traffic lights not aligned in front of you so it’s not clear what lane? Intersection not aligned so you can’t just go straight across? People intruding? Contradictory signs? Signs covered by tree branches? No sight line when turning?

      After that experiment, it seems like “edge” cases are more common than “normal” cases when driving. Humans just handle it without thinking about it, but the car needs more work here

    • teft@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I grew up in Maine. Deer in the road isn’t an edge case there. It’s more like a nightly occurrence.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Fences alongside the road and special animal crossings are unfeasible with US roads length, yes?..

        I’ve read that they do that … somewhere.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Same in Kansas. Was in a car that hit one in the 80s and see them often enough that I had to avoid one that was crossing a busy interstste highway last week.

        Deer are the opposite of an edge case in the majority of the US.

        • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s no different in Southern Ontario where I live. Saw a semi truck plow into one, it really wasn’t pretty. Another left a huge dent on my mom’s car when she hit one driving at night.

    • nialv7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah this Tesla owner is dumb. wdym “we just need to train the AI to know what deer butts look like”? Tesla had radar and sonar, it didn’t need to know what a deer’s butt looks like because radar would’ve told it something was there! But they took it away because Musk had the genius idea of only using cameras for whatever reason.

  • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Deer aren’t edge cases. If you are in a rural community or the suburbs, deer are a daily way of life.

    As more and more of their forests are destroyed, deer are a daily part of city life. I live in the middle of a large midwestern city; in neighborhood with houses crowded together. I see deer in my lawn regularly.

    • agless@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The deer are actually the ones doing much of the deforestation.

      But I agree with your point that the overpopulation is impossible to miss. I’m also in the suburbs of a major Midwestern city and the deer are everywhere. My city tags them so, oddly, you kind of get to know them.

      Last year #100 and #161 both had fawns in my back yard (for a total of 3 babies). This year, #161 dropped 2 more back there. I still see #100 around, but I don’t think she had offspring this year. She might have been sterilized, but I heard that the city stopped doing that because some of our tagged deer were tracked to 2 states away. Now we just cull them.

      Two days ago I saw a buck (rare for the 'burbs) chasing a few of this year’s fawns around. I thought “you dummy, those girls are too young to breed,” but then I looked it up, and apparently sexual maturity in deer is determined by weight, not age. Does can participate in their first-year rut if they’ve had enough to eat. And those little shits have had plenty of flowers out of my garden.

      • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I see buck all the time I’m my neighborhood! I was on a walk earlier this summer and turned a corner to be face to face with a small herd that was hopping fences to graze. The buck was across the street and just stared at me.

        At first I was afraid because they can get big, but now I’ve seen them a few times and I’m thinking they are used to people. I’m still not getting close if I can help it. They are much bigger than you would expect.

        I like seeing them but I feel bad that they are stuck in the city.

  • Madnessx9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Full speed in the dark, I think most people would failed to avoid that. What’s concerning is it does not stop afterwards

    • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Isn’t Elon advertising AI as orders of magnitudes better reaction time and much less error prone than a human though…

      • lando55@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Remember when they removed ultrasonic and radar sensors in favor of “Tesla Vision”? That decision demonstrably cost people their lives and yet older, proven tech continues to be eschewed in favor of the cutting edge new shiny.

        I’m all for pushing the envelope when it comes to advancements in technology and AI in its many forms, but those of us that don’t buy Teslas never signed up to volunteer our lives as training data for FSD.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Note that part of the discussion is we shouldn’t settle for human limitations when we don’t have to. Notably things like LIDAR are considered to give these systems superhuman vision. However, Tesla said ‘eyes are good enough for folks, so just cameras’.

      The rest of the industry said LIDAR is important and focus on trying to make it more practical.

      • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        The rest of the industry said LIDAR is important and focus on trying to make it more practical.

        Volvo is using LIDAR. I trust them way more than Tesla when it comes to something pertaining to safety.

      • linearchaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Hell, even not having lidar The thing was pretty clearly a large road obstacle a second and a half out. They had a whole left lane open At least enough time to do a significant speed reduction.

  • blady_blah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago
    1. Vehicle needed lidar
    2. Vehicle should have a collision detection indicator for anomalous collisions and random mechanical problems
  • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Is there video that actually shows it “keeps going”? The way that video loops I know I can’t tell what happens immediately after.

    • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The way that video loops I know I can’t tell what happens immediately after.

      SRSLY?

      Have you ever been in a car, going fast?

      You can see in the video that the car does NOT brake hard before the crash. Not even in the very last second.

      What did YOU think what happens in the next second?

      • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        What I think doesn’t matter. I’d like to actually see the whole video though. Then I nor you would need to hypothesize about it either.

  • WhyFlip@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    As much as I hate Elon, self-driving cars are the future and will be way safer than some idiot behind the wheel

    • Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      “As much as I hate elon…”

      “I hate elon as much as the next guy, but…”

      “Look, I’m no elon fan, but…”

      I’m sure you all know, but to be clear, the above are the beginnings of sentences from people who don’t hate elon. They are sentences from people who like elon, but think you will hate them, or not consider their opinions, if they say out loud that they do, in fact, like elon.

      On a separate but related note, this is elon speaking at a hate-filled rally featuring a series of bigoted speakers, including himself. The rally very intentionally cosplayed an American Nazi rally that famously occurred at Madison Square garden in the 1930s. To emphasize how on the nose this all was, elon wore a specially made hat - a hat that very deliberately used an especially prominent font from the Nazi era. They are literally SCREAMING it in your face and tattooing it on their foreheads

      elon has done nothing good or admirable with his life and elon will will not do anything good or admirable with his life. You can’t compartmentalize your opinion on this, he sucks, on the whole.

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yeah, but Elon’s self-driving cars aren’t self-driving, nor are they necessarily as safe a good driver.

      There are people out there who shouldn’t be able to drive, and in sane countries many of them don’t manage to get their licenses. But in the US for an example, apparently you can’t get anywhere without a car, so until the public transit situation is solved, drivers licenses need to be given out like candy :/ Exception being some cities with awesome public transit. The only one I’ve been to is NYC, where most people don’t really need to drive. I’d say the transit there is better than in my country.

      And the worst part is that even once real SDCs exist and can be bought, not everyone can afford them. Or maybe they’ll be more like Uber or Bolt in that you hail one from an app and it picks you up - but then people in rural areas are still fucked without being able to drive themselves.

  • Emerald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I notice nobody has commented on the fact that the driver should’ve reacted to the deer. It’s not Tesla’s responsibility to emergency brake, even if that is a feature in the system. Drivers are responsible for their vehicle’s movements at the end of the day.

    • chaogomu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Then it’s not “Full self driving”. It’s at best lane assistance, but I wouldn’t trust that either.

      Elon needs to shut the fuck up about self driving and maybe issue a full recall, because he’s going to get people killed.

  • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    You don’t think humans are doing this? Everything I’ve seen is autopilot is safer than humans in the aggregate.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Are you honestly defending this, the software took a life and didnt react. Im not on a skynet buzz but it is concerningly bad software and implementation.

      I dont care if humans do it, they shouldnt and that should be the easy bar to clear in implementing a replacement for humans.

      • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Honestly if the software is better than humans yeah. I’m also very much moving insurance costs to the software and having insurance based on those exact things.

        If the software is safer then humans I don’t care if it makes mistakes at a lower rate.