(By game size he means scope of the game and huge open world maps, not game install size)

  • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    4 days ago

    Here’s hoping! Not only has it ruined a lot of once-smaller games, but it’s also largely responsible for ballooning development budgets, so let’s get that down to something sustainable.

      • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        I know this is a cynical critique of capitalism, but even so, capitalists love lowering budgets and charging the same amount. Quite frankly, I’d happily pay the same or more to get a game with less bloat in a lot of cases.

  • you_are_dust@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’d rejoice, but I’ll believe it when I see it happening consistently. I want smaller, denser, and richer worlds. Not giant, sprawling, and barren. It doesn’t add anything to a game for me if I have to walk or drive 10 minutes to get to my next location and it’s just empty in between.

    • BleatingZombie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      What we’ll probably get (from Bethesda) is a combination of both. Smaller, barren, and procedurally generated

  • Stovetop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I realized this idea long, long ago, when Rare made Banjo-Tooie.

    Banjo-Kazooie was a fun game. You unlock worlds, go to the world, collect 100% of all there is to collect, then continue.

    Banjo-Tooie, its sequel, wanted to be bigger and better in every way. Sprawling open world hub, much larger worlds with more sub-zones, interconnectivity between worlds, more things to unlock, more things to do, etc. etc.

    And I think, despite having so much more, it was a worse game for it. You go to a new world but find there’s a lot you can’t do yet because you didn’t unlock an ability that comes later on. You push a button in one world and then something happens in another, but now you have to backtrack through the sprawling overworld and large world maps to get there.

    And this was just a pair of games made for the Nintendo 64, before the concept of “open world” had really even taken off.

    But it demonstrated to me that bigger was not always better, and having more to do did not make it a better game if it wasn’t as enjoyable.

    Early open world games were fairly small, and the natural desire for people who have seen everything becomes “I wish there was more,” but in practice it ends up typically being that they take the same amount of stuff and divide it up over a larger area, or they fill the world with tedium just for the sake of having something to do.

    When looking at the collectibles and activities on a world map like Genshin Impact, it’s basically sensory overload with how much there is to do.

    But almost all of that is garbage. And this is just a fraction of one region among several. Go here, do this time trial, shoot these balloons, follow this spirit, solve this logic puzzle, and then loot your pittance of gatcha currency so you can try to win your next waifu or husbando before time runs out.

    And don’t forget to do your dailies!

    If a game has a large world, it needs to act in service to its design. It needs to be fun to exist in and travel through, not tedious. It needs to have enough stuff to do that keep it from feeling empty, but not so much stuff that it makes it hard to find anything worthwhile. And it needs to give enough ability for the player to make their own fun, to act as the balance on that tightrope walk between not-enough and too-much.

    Breath of the Wild/Tears of the Kingdom are the most recent games that seemed to properly scratch an open world itch for me. While they weren’t perfect, the way they managed to really incorporate the open world as its own sort of puzzle to solve, in ways that Genshin Impact failed to properly emulate, made them more enjoyable as an open world than most other games in that genre I’ve played in recent memory.

  • demizerone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I was excited by Tears of the Kingdom but when I opened up the underground area I passed. That game is the biggest open world I have not experienced.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    I would absolutely love it if games started going back to the original Borderlands 1 style maps/areas. The type of maps that were more small-medium sized area that were completely self-contained sections of a larger world.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    There are quite a lot of ways of making an open world game with infinite replayability without requiring massive maps, but they’re not in the style AAA gaming has been going for in the past decade, they’re more things like Oxygen Not Included, Factorio, Minecraft or Battle Brothers were the game space is procedurally generated, the fun is in conquering the challenges of a map, and once you exhaust it you stop yet end up coming back months later and try a new game with a new map, from scratch, because it’s again fun and there’s no “I know this map” to spoil it.

    The handmade game spaces with custom made “adventures” do manage to have better experiences than those games that rely on procedural generation and naturally emerging situations for providing gamers with experiences, but they’re mainly once of and rely on sheer size to remain entertaining for long.

  • mercano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yakuza maps have never been particularly huge. Even in the most recent game, the new map is maybe on the scale of GTA III or Vice City. Still, they manage to pack 15-20 minigames into each game’s word map, some of which involve driving or riding around the map, plus the inevitable scavenger hunts and hidden collectibles.

  • Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    Infinite Wealth was deffo a bigger map and set thereof then its predecessors (Like a Dragon was also substantially larger, as was Lost Judgment in comparison to its predecessor), but it did absolute numbers, so I dunno about that.

    I think it comes down more to if it feels appropriately sized and filled. Prior Yakuzas were bursting at the seems with shit to do everywhere in their smaller maps. Breath of the Wild had new and interesting shit going on everywhere too.

    • almar_quigley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’ve gotta disagree on BotW. I love Zelda games and the mechanics of that game were an amazing shift in the franchise. But that open world was so boring. The same like 4-5 enemies, even the harder variants didn’t have different movesets. TotK was even worse with the depths and a majority of sky islands being empty and devoid of content.

      But the e gameplay is so fun it’s a lot easier to forgive them than say AC Odyssey.

      • jacksilver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’ve been saying this since it released. Cool mechanics, but boring world and gameplay. I’m still a bit salty about the loss of real dungeons, nothing in BOTW or TOTK feel as memorable as the previous games.

    • Daveyborn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      2 of the 3 maps in infinite wealth were re-used anyways. I really like that they get good mileage from reusing assets they make.

  • .Donuts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Weird. In the West, we’ve been welcoming small(er) but interesting, unique or otherwise impactful games regardless of its size. Complaining about Warzone taking up 250GB on your hard drive and stuff. And that was 2020.

    • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      Not so much the size it takes up on your drive, he’s referring to the breadth and scope of the game itself.

      • .Donuts@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        You right, my thoughts trailed and I added that last bit even though it didn’t have to do with it, idk why.

  • nawa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Well then why did the newer LaD games have larger maps than Yakuza 0-6? I feel like Kamurocho was the perfect size for a game that’s always on foot, and while I enjoyed LaD 7, I think the map was too large and I had to rely on taxis much more than I did in older games. What they should’ve done is add the underground and interior stuff to Kamurocho instead of switching to a different map.