so we can keep being stuck with corposhit products with no alternatives?
What’s #cat-v?
Considered harmful.
It’s the IRC channel for https://cat-v.org/ There are some very clever people there with very specific ideas and opinions about computing.Clearly they can’t adjust the CSS to make it fit for phones
they can, they don’t want to.
cat -v
considered harmfulBell Laboratories Murray Hill, NJ (dec!ucb)wav!research!rob It seems that UNIX has become the victim of cancerous growth at the hands of organizations such as UCB. 4.2BSD is an order of magnitude larger than Version 5, but, Pike claims, not ten times better. The talk reviews reasons for UNIX's popularity and shows, using UCB cat as a primary example, how UNIX has grown fat. cat isn't for printing files with line numbers, it isn't for compressing multiple blank lines, it's not for looking at non-printing ASCII characters, it's for concatenating files. We are reminded that ls isn't the place for code to break a single column into multiple ones, and that mailnews shouldn't have its own more processing or joke encryption code. Rob carried the standard well for the "spirit of UNIX," and you can look forward to a deeper look at the philosophy of UNIX in his forthcoming book.
Rob carried the standard well for the “spirit of UNIX,”
if (isatty(1)) {
if (ioctl(1,JMUX,0) >= 0) { struct winsize win; if (ioctl(1,JWINSIZE,&win) >= 0) { screenwidth = win.bytesx; if (screenwidth == 0) screenwidth++; } } qflg = Cflg = 1; (void) gtty(1, &sgbuf); if ((sgbuf.sg_flags & XTABS) == 0) usetabs = 1; }
Yeah there are some pieces of code that are super bloated in the FOSS community. I think it does not help overall because it mixes the primitive meaning for an application. Such as systemd or even GCC. I’m starting to like much more simple designs like GNU Shepherd. Or the idea of having a Hurd like kernel (which does not need to be Hurd). Or shifting to more simple CPU ISAs. Designs should have the necessary entropy, not more not less. Trying to allocate more stuff in a design does not help.
I think some part of the GNU community is starting to understand that.
Emacs is bloated? Probably more than it should be. Maybe it should be more minimalistic and move most of it to modules. But is LEGO bloated? Emacs can be regarded bloated because how it is shiped, but not for what it is. Not being modular and programmable would make Emacs not Emacs.
This is a topic very interesting to touch but probably not to talk about it in a comment section hahahha.
Clones are also great for publicity and awareness. People are searching for alternatives to (insert program here).
You can always start your own project. Just saying.
Tiling window managers fit this for me.
The first version of Windows used tiling.
Not really. The tiling in windows didn’t work in the same automatic “turn it on and watch it go” way that it does on Linux. But don’t let that get in the way of your bizarre Linux trolling as I know you’ve been waiting all day for your moment to “shine”
Working on it.
Open source projects create corposhit because the developers working on them work for corporations who pay them to create the corposhit. The fact that they’re open source is just so that the corporation can benefit for free from contributions by developers outside the company. That’s all.
girl says FOSS not OSS. i think its about the FLOSS part of FOSS, thats most of the time not corpo driven
Might be my fav so far