• BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    That is a FANTASTIC idea because AI is KNOWN to be SUPER STABLE and REALLY GOOD at what it’s Designed to do! NYT will save a TON of Money fixing their DailyAI instead of Paying Workers!

  • Bosht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Oh, okay. Well obviously fuck this guy. I can’t imagine being enough of an asshole to see staff go on strike and your first thought is ‘let me pitch my shitty AI!’

  • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    And there it is, the actual reason the owning class are jizzing themselves over AI:

    Finally they never have to worry about their underlings ever again, now they truly are everything and as self-reliant and self-made as they always told everyone from private school.

  • thefartographer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Do it. I fucking dare you. It’ll be fun to watch a media powerhouse and a douche meth lab burn each other down.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    14 hours ago

    If the New York times wants to continue to be irrelevant entity in the world than they won’t take him up on that offer.

    • gwilikers@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Are you saying that if NYT wants to continue to be relavent then they should agree?

      • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        No they’re saying that the NYT (the fucking NEW YORK TIMES) is irrelevant and will continue to be if they don’t switch to AI.

        Which is even worse