• OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Maybe they require a large horizontal distance to take off, like a plane

    Basically the balrog stalled out

  • bcovertigo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    If I pushed an albatross down a well and attached a crab to it to harrass it on the way down it would also fall, despite being a fantastic winged flier.

    Imagine them with wings ill suited to vertical flight and hovering, but very fast in the sky while soaring, and with the endurance to keep going for hours.

    It’s my headcannon, but I give Gandalf points for forcing the fighter jet into a helicopter arena.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    “A complete consistency (either within the compass of the Silmarillion itself or between The Silmarillion and other published writings of my father’s) is not to be looked for, and could only be achieved, if at all, at heavy and needless cost.”

    • Christopher Tolkien
      The Silmarillian Forward, 1977
    • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Needless cost?

      That is just so what a nerd (Tolkien) would say about other needs nerding out.

      Just let us nerd, ok?!

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I think he means in terms of time. In order to make it fully consistent, you’d have to have some kind of index and go through line by line making sure everything is saying the same thing.

        Oh, wait…

    • WillBalls@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s similar to searching for consistencies amongst any mythology, which is what Tolkien was attempting to create. Tales will always change over time, and they’ll always shift focus to what the teller determines is important. As focuses of a society shift, so do the focuses of its related mythology. In this way, I think Tolkien did an excellent job creating a united mythos for England in all the different versions of his legendarium. As the tales evolved, consistencies emerged elements which were formerly key, were discarded, and internal references became more commonplace than external references (see Tolkien’s influences from William Morris and Icelandic, Celtic, Germanic, and Anglo Saxon epics)

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        That was the challenge Christopher noted in the forward to the Silmarillion. J.R.R. had started working it in 1917, and kept making changes right up until his death in 1973.

        So he had 56 years worth of papers, and notes, lots of it hand written, to try to kind of reconcile into a single work.

        • WillBalls@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s been a few years since I’ve read the foreword to the Silmarillion, but I’m glad I’m consistent with Christopher’s analysis 😁

  • Sundial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    These are divine beings. Their speed doesn’t necessarily imply how they got from point A to point B so quickly.

        • Kethal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Apparently it’s real for a lot of people judging by the number of down votes I got. They’re upvoting this though, which I don’t get. Perhaps they don’t know that this meme is making fun of nerds who treat fiction like it’s reality.

          • halyk.the.red@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            I think it’s the spirit of your comment.

            It’s almost in the same vein as someone going to a magic show and loudly proclaiming that magic isn’t real and it’s all stagecraft.

            I’d say your comment wasn’t exactly required, we all know it’s just stories. But it’s also an open forum and you’re free to comment all you like. If it’s any consolation, I didn’t downvote you.

            • Kethal@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              24 hours ago

              I think nitpicking the inconsistencies in a work of fiction is like going to a magic show and pointing out that it’s not real. No one cares that the balrog had wings, or was divine or whatever contrivance people need to chew on until the story is tasteless. Suspend some disbelief, and just let the thing fall.

              • Agrivar@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                23 hours ago

                …and yet, as evidenced by the many back-and-forth discussions in this very thread, plenty of people do care enough to reread older texts and workshop theories to explain the discrepancy. YOU think that no one cares because YOU don’t care, but you are clearly wrong.