• umbraroze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Huh.

    You know, when I think of supercomputer applications, I think of deeply analytical problems based on solid math and well understood algorithms that can be highly parallelised to take the maximum theoretical advantage of the hardware at hand.

    You know, the opposite of what the “AI” crowd is doing. Throwing vast amounts of crunching power at a barely understood hypothetical black-box problem in hopes that it potentially yields some interesting results. Maybe.

    • Opisek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Why think of intelligent solutions when you can just throw more money at the problem. Surely that’s how you deal with issues.

    • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Too, bad. He won the election he bought, and so now he’s (no joke) being proposed as speaker of the house (3rd in line to presidency) which is an unelected position.

      Then if/when Trump dies and JD Vance gets killed/abdictates, you have Elon President.

  • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Anything Musk touches is immediately tainted by association. Any AI product he has a say in should immediately be considered a potential danger to humanity as a whole.