Smartphone makers will soon face an unlikely competitor. Concerns about the impact of social media are driving demand for old-school Nokia brick-like handsets…

  • Floey@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I use my phone as a mobile computer, I almost never make calls with it. No way am I switching back.

  • qaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 days ago

    I see a variation of this headline every couple of years, it’s continued existence disproves itself.

  • Chaos0f7ife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think flip phones are more likely. I’ve contemplated several times of turning my phone in for the old flip phone. Might just be the nastalgia talking though.

  • jrs100000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    I got one just to put my 2FA sim cards in. It cost like $10, the battery lasts a week, I can just mute the ringer cause I only care if its getting a text message I just requested, and if my real phone is ever lost or stolen the keys to my accounts are sitting safely in a drawer at home.

    • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      You should never use SMS for 2FA. The network is incredibly insecure, as evidenced by the recent alarms that China has been in the network for a while now. 2FA codes over SMS are rarely stolen from the legitimate device itself. Hackers will just pull off a different scheme, like SIM swapping, and they’ll own all your codes and you won’t have a clue until it’s too late.

      • jrs100000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        If only every service I need gave other options. In any case, the card numbers are not connected to me or the account in any publicly accessible way. Thats part of the whole point of running them off a separate phone. I dont give anyone that number except for the purpose of 2FA, so SIM swapping wont work, the sim card never leaves the house, so scan based exploits wont work, and the phone doesnt have the hardware required to be vulnerable to more sophisticated phone based attacks. If any major government intelligence agency wants in theyll find a way, but using a separate dumb phone should be significantly more secure than using the SIM in my regular phone.

        • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I dont give anyone that number except for the purpose of 2FA, so SIM swapping wont work, the sim card never leaves the house, so scan based exploits wont work, and the phone doesnt have the hardware required to be vulnerable to more sophisticated phone based attacks.

          I understand what you’re saying. But the reality is everything you just said doesn’t matter for SIM swapping. The fact that you use the phone number for that service says that the number you use is out in the wild. Typically when SIM swapping is used is when there’s a data breach and your username, email, password, and phone number are leaked. But they still can’t get in because of the extra 2FA step.

          So they HAVE that phone number. SIM swapping is done at the carrier level. It’s when the associated number is “swapped” to a different SIM card (one that the hackers own). Which means you can get totally screwed over without lifting a finger and not a single person touching your computer or phone.

          Like I said before, the damage to you would be done before you even knew what happened.

          Edit: autocorrect

          Edit 2: and yes, I understand many services have no other options than SMS, which is why it’s such a huge massive problem.

  • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    I hope for something like the Motorola D lineup. You could take out the original battery and replace it for 4xAA batteries. That’s pretty cool.

    A few months ago I was quite happy to finally win one functional handset, Motorola D170, in auction for just around €7 incl. shipping. Unfortunately, I always bring bad luck. The seller unexpectedly ended up in hospital and I got a refund.

    The D170 even has a flip-out keypad cover which makes it even cooler. And all of these have extendable antennas.
    A picture of D170 for illustration (not the same unit):

    Otherwise the most available seems to be D520, but almost all of them are corroded and non-functional because people left batteries in them.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      And they won’t work anymore with the retirement of analog years ago, 2G years ago, and now 3G for consumer use (I’m assuming that phone was analog/2G).

      • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        If I remember correctly, GSM900. The shutdown of 2G in my country is set at around 2028 - 2030, so I’d be good for a bit.

        In other words, just like with my current phone that doesn’t work with VoLTE on my carrier because VoLTE is a total mess. This once again leaves me with 2G for phone calls. (Although I use LTE-only to prioritize data meaning nobody can call me ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯)
        Hell, my carrier hasn’t even yet implemented USSD over IMS which means no call barring settings, no call forwarding settings, no caller ID settings, no USSD codes and just everything else that uses MMI codes. All depends on GSM.

        I don’t know why it is accepted that there’s no single mandatory standard for VoLTE that would work everywhere, but I guess people’s ability to put up with BS is just going up over time.
        And yes, this impacts emergency services too, with US visitors, for example, even if the devices support VoLTE at home.

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    The whole focus of concern about social media is on kids being exposed to material their parents don’t want them to see. I think this misses a much larger point - simply the effect social media overuse has on attention span and encouraging superficial thinking.

    Scrolling through the firehose of infinite content trains people to process each item as quickly as possible and make a quick value judgement based on minimal information before moving on to the next item. This is absolutely backasswards of how kids should learn to think. It encourages binary thinking - seeing every issue as two opposite extremes - and spending as little effort as possible acquiring information before making that binary decision about who to idolize or demonize. Degrading people’s intellectual process makes them much more susceptible to suggestion and conditioning, which of course is how oligarchs want us.

  • marlowe221@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Can I just have a modern Motorola Razr so I can pretend to be Captain Kirk again, please?

  • OminousOrange@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I heard about the Light Phone recently and I think it’s a decent bridge between the old brick phones and modern smartphones. It has navigation and music functionality that a brick phone wouldn’t, but doesn’t have all the rest of the attention thieving bloat of a smartphone.

    It would be nice to have music streaming capability and alternative messaging apps (Signal) and perhaps a web browser, though.