• randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    5 days ago

    Authentication for my work email: Enter 28 character password, receive sms, enter message, log in

    Authentication for my Battle.net account:

    -Enter email made before 2000 because they don’t let you change email

    -Enter password

    -Get rejected

    -Solve CAPTCHA

    -Try backup passwords, get rejected

    -Request new password

    -Send request to 24 year old email

    -Try to log on to 24 year old email, email is suspicious and sends Authentication request to my newer email

    -Open newer email, Authenticate older email

    -open old email, Put in code to battle.net

    -Battle.net requests Authenticator code from Battle.net app

    -Open battle.net app (no requests)

    -Try manual code, doesn’t work

    • Realize Battle.net app Authenticator not connected

    -Try to connect Battle.net app Authenticator to account

    -Realize you cannot connect Authenticator without signing in AND signing in requires Authenticator

    -Close Battle.net app

    -Open Blizzard Authenticator

    -Close warning that this app got depreciated in January

    -Enter manual code

    -it works

    -Attempt to change password to password I first attempted

    -Won’t let me use same password

    -Try logging in using that password

    -Still doesn’t work - Solve one more CAPTCHA

    -Change password to backup password and back to original password - have to solve 2 more Captchas

    -Finally works

    -Log in

  • archchan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    I hate forced 2FA that you can’t disable anyway. I don’t want to waste time waiting for an insecure text, I don’t want to input an unencrypted code you sent to my email, I don’t want to click your damn notification that runs through Play Services, and no I’m not enrolling in passwordless auth. I don’t need to be babied into securing my accounts. Any account I do actively and willingly secure is already using TOTP. Let me put in my username and password, then kindly fuck off.

    • Charlatan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yeah. So you, myself, and some others are the exception to the rule. But, you can’t look at it that way because its a ‘lowest common denominator’ problem. The least secure of us means we are all only as secure. Others need to be hand held.

      It’s definitely time to raise all boats and drop SMS 2fa like a hot rock.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        The most natural authentication mechanism for humans is a key. That thing you carry with yourself. A physical key containing, well, the actual secret (shouldn’t be retrievable, should be used for decrypting access request and signing the response) that, maybe combined with your password (another natural for humans authentication mechanism) or maybe, yes, TOTP, gives you access.

        Like those “security keys” Imperial officers in Jedi Outcast carry with them. Maybe a bad example.

        Phone numbers are used as identifiers because governments like it, nerds don’t like it, and normies explicitly like what nerds don’t like and also want everything to be insecure, they call it “having nothing to hide”.

        Also “normal and social” people have that idea that their social prowess is more elegant, smarter at ensuring their security that those dumb and boring nerd technical solutions. So them always choosing things logically opposite of sane, like social media instead of forums, and phone numbers instead of any other identifier, is literally a matter of principle. It’s really not that hard to use something else. They do the stupidest possible thing technically to prove a point that you only have to do the smart thing socially. I mean, in Galileo Galilei’s case the other side of the disagreement is generally considered right, but that’s not an argument effective in society.

        I should admit that I’ve been doing the opposite - the stupidest possible thing socially to prove a point that only technical sense matters, which is why nobody would send me encrypted mail except Facebook with its notifications, and nobody would write me in Tox, and nobody would even contact me via XMMP. Which is why I’m now using TG, VK, FB, WA and Signal for communication, of these Signal is secure, and WA is kinda better than the rest of them.

  • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    So many services still don’t even offer 2FA at all. Any service that stores payment information and PII without any 2FA options, let alone a secure one, at this point are a disgrace.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    The end of an era.

    Or actually, probably not until we redo whole cellular phone technology works and kick out all the bad actors using SS7 vulnerabilities for stuff like spoofing numbers and stealing messages. We really shouldn’t be using a 45 year old system for almost all communications.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Use Telegram.

      Not the app, the 200 year old wire radio messaging system based on Morse code, E2EE (Elderly man to Elderly man Enciphered)

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I guarantee you that is the opposite of a solution, old man encryption is very easily hacked by other old men for spoofing, redirecting, or listening.

  • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Since when was sms ever secure? My understanding is that messages are sent in the clear, meaning your carrier and the recipient’s carrier both have the opportunity to intercept messages.

    I mean that’s the message content, not the authentication, but still, sms is the opposite of secure, always has been.

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    of course it is. forced 2fa BY SMS OF ALL THINGS is one of the stupidest ideas

    • capital@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      I assume businesses only jumped at the chance to enable SMS 2FA to get their greedy little fingers on our phone numbers.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        It was the simplest/cheapest form of 2FA to implement. Grandma will never understand how to setup TOTP.

        Capitalism requires regulations, otherwise it will ALWAYS do what is cheapest or most profitable, regardless of how dangerous or destructive.

  • Edieto12@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    id take email Authentication over sms Authentication if there was only them 2 let me use my 2facter app for the love of god plz i hate how banks use sms its like come on man

    • oldfart@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      They will now push proprietary apps which steal your data, so you decide.

      In a sane world we would move to yubikeys or codes like Google authenticator, but we live in a post sane technological world

  • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Thank god, give me my HMAC hash please.

    Nothing more terrifying than losing your phone number these days because of all the accounts tied to it via 2FA.

  • communism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I wish Signal stopped using it. I know you can set a Signal PIN but a lot of the non-techy friends I speak to on Signal probably wouldn’t think to, or look through the settings (not that you need to be “techy” to set it, but you know the kind of learned helplessness most people have about tech). At least a prompt for all users to set an account PIN so their account can’t just be stolen by anyone with their SIM card.