• theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        61
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        Yeah, so the thing is, any amount of trust that I had has already been completely destroyed. “We don’t do it anymore because it’s illegal, trust me bro” isn’t going to cut it. Does the bill include mandatory prison time for executives for violations, or just cost-of-doing-business fines? Will this be enforced by a government regulatory body that is not literally outnumbered 20:1 by car manufacturer lawyers?

        If the car has any kind of network capabilities and 100% of the car’s software is not open source, I’m not buying it. Period.

        This bill would not need to exist if cars were FOSS, or if cars were non-networked. Those are the only 2 solutions that I will accept. This bill is worthless to me.

        • eatCasserole@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          18 days ago

          I didn’t read too far, but,

          To restrict car manufacturers and other companies from selling consumer car-related data, increase transparency regarding data practices, and for other purposes.

          already skips over collecting the data, so yeah. I would guess this bill just exists for the optics, and isn’t actually intended to challenge the industry.

        • TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          19 days ago

          I agree with you, the damage has been done. That’s why I’m looking at alternative methods of transportation, like an ebike or public transit. Hopefully your area has good infrastructure for that.

        • essteeyou@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          19 days ago

          It’s nice to have principles, but in a few years you’re going to have to find a new way to get around.

          • Cris@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            19 days ago

            I mean, a lot of cars have a genuinely phenomenal life span, if you don’t mind getting something that isn’t shiny and new you can probably get like a 2012 Toyota or Honda and drive it till the wheels fall off. My dream car is from the 90s and people still generally regard them as fairly reliable

            Eventually it’ll be an issue, but that does leave a lot of time for nerds and hackers to find a way to gut networking stuff while telling the car it’s still intact. Dunno if we’ll ever see an open source car OS compatible with the systems in major manufacturer’s vehicles, but privacy workarounds feel like they could be pretty realistic

            • Anivia@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              19 days ago

              My dream car is from the 90s and people still generally regard them as fairly reliable

              I would not want to share the road with modern oversized cars while driving a car with 90s crash safety

              I drive a Miata as a 2nd car for weekend fun, but it’s not a real option as a daily driver if you value your life

              Not to mention that it uses 8 liters of gas per 100km, whilst my daily driver averages 12wkh per 100km

              • Cris@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                19 days ago

                Thats fair. A na miata is basically my dream car, I hope to someday daily one in spite of being from the 90s 😅

          • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            19 days ago

            Lol cars last more than “a few years”, my current vehicle is 20 years old. I’ll easily get another 150,000 miles out of it, probably more. I already have a crate motor picked out to swap in when the engine finally dies. Or I could just “upgrade” to a newer year and still be non-networked.

            Now I’m being a little silly, but at this rate of climate change acceleration, I’m starting to bet that my current vehicle is going to outlive capitalism anyway.

  • FrankFrankson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    136
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    Touchscreens were never popular with customers. Manufacturers kept cramming touchscreens in cars and using them to control everything becuase they were being stupid with new tech.

    Edit: I guess I should have been clearer. I was talking about as a replacement for tactile controlls in a car like the article is talking about. Reverse cameras and other things that are good to have a touch screen for make perfect sense but using your touch screen to control your Air conditioning in a way that you have to divert your attention from the road to operate sliders and buttons on a touch screen is dumb as hell.

    • Sunshine (she/her)@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      82
      ·
      19 days ago

      Also the fact that touch screens are cheaper to build with how expensive battery tech has been in electric cars.

    • Anivia@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      Touchscreens are great to have, controlling Android Auto or Apple Carplay with physical buttons like you have to do in a Mazda is a nightmare.

      The problem is when the touchscreen is used as a replacement for physical controls, instead of an addition. Stuff like controlling your climate control should not be exclusively controlled through the touchscreen

      And don’t even get me started about VWs stupid decision to put touch controls on the steering wheel. At least they backpedaled on that decision pretty quickly

      • svtdragon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        19 days ago

        My wife and I drive almost the same model of Audi, separated by a couple of years. One still has physical buttons for infotainment and one has a touch screen, but both support Android Auto and CarPlay.

        I prefer the physical controls for it, because I can glance at the screen and know “turn right two clicks and press down” to get where I want, and then look back at the road while I do it.

        • ditty@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          17 days ago

          I added Android Auto and Apple Carplay to my 2016 Audi via an aftermarket add-on module that ties into its native MMI system and it requires me to use the dial and buttons to interact with it. I also really like doing it that way for the reason you described. I can easily switch apps and navigate menus by counting clicks without taking my eyes off the road. Plus I can still use my phone for some of the more complicated interactions like entering in addresses that Google Assistant can’t decipher (only when the vehicle is stopped and in a brief and safe manner, of course)

    • DannyMac@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      19 days ago

      Touchscreens are cheaper UI part too. It saved money and “looked cool”… Win-win for shareholders

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 days ago

      Touch screens also seem like they would be easier to integrate with subscription services. Auto manufacturers are looking to make things like heated seats a subscription.

      Cars have been getting steadily worse. There doesn’t seem to be any enforcement of recalls (has anyone satisfactorily had the Honda Civic 2016-2021 air conditioning resolved? How much did you spend?)

      If they can take cars away from us entirely, and move to us renting self driving cars, that’s what they would really want to do. Pay for your radio, pay for heat and AC…

  • NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    Also, bring back gauges, instead of idiot-lights. It’s nice to know when a problem is beginning (overheating, etc) before it becomes a crisis when you have no choice but to pull over.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      Yeah I hate it when information is hidden in the name of minimalism. I’d rather have a plane cockpit UI than a bicycle UI, even if it means I feel like an idiot at various points when I discover new things I could have been doing the whole time.

      • Broken@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        18 days ago

        My hybrid dash is anything but minimal. I have a zillion selections to show me a slew of random things. None of them are an engine temperature reading. So frustrating.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 days ago

          If it hasn’t happened already, it wouldn’t surprise me if useful instrumentation space is reallocated to advertisement space at some point. Though hopefully the consumer rage in response would end whatever company tries that first.

          • Broken@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            18 days ago

            It’ll start as a feature. When you need gas we’ll automatically show you the cheapest gas stations around you. People will gobble it up.

    • Kethal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      I recently learned that in my car the same light is used to indicate that the parking brake is on and that the brake fluid is low. Nothing bad happened, and it’s getting worked on, but my first thought was that the sensor on the brake must be broken. It’s poor design, seemingly without reason.

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    I’m so glad I kept my car and weathered through this shitty phase of car manufacturing.

    If only there was hope for weathering through the data collection, subscription-based features and the death of sedans though…

  • Zerthax@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    19 days ago

    Yay, I never left having physical controls for things like HVAC controls and volume.

    Touchscreens are great for context-sensitive controls, but less so for things that should be accessible at all times and usable without looking.

  • RoyaltyInTraining@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    Touchscreens can stay, but only for non-essential tasks like changing settings or entering addresses. Climate, media, and all other controls you usually use while driving should be tactile by mandate.

  • Unknown1234_5@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    18 days ago

    Should be illegal to have touchscreen controls in a car, it requires you to look at it to effectively control it, which means the car forces you to ignore the road to do anything.

  • datendefekt@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    Back in the 80s, Don Norman popularized the term affordance. Humans need something to push, pull, turn or otherwise interact with. We are physical beings in a physical world.

    Driving vehicles is potentially life-endangering. Just because the technology is there and cheaper does not mean that humans can push aside their physiological limitations in a critical situation.

    Take the emergency blinker. You know where it is, you see it all the time - it’s right there in front of you! But when a real emergency happens, you’ll be fumbling for the button, concentrating on the situation at hand. Now imagine that button on a touchscreen.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 days ago

      I use my four way hazard lights when there’s heavy braking on the freeway to make sure people behind me are paying attention. It’s a button on my dash and pretty easy to toggle.

      Though is that something that touch screen cars really put into the touch screen!?

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      I don’t know Don, I’m sure he’s a fine guy, but I’ve read about all these kinds of rules (EDIT: emerging) much earlier - as early as 1940s, with airplanes and cars and other machines in production and in front lines that people had to operate for long hours under strain and make as few mistakes as possible.

      Even USSR, not the Rome of ergonomics, had GOSTs for average ratio of errors an operator makes on a certain machine, machines had to be inside those numbers in tests involving people, or they wouldn’t get adopted into wide usage.

      Note how the criterion is defined. Not formalities like the shape of something or the layout conforming to some vague definition, but the results of an actual test on people. Of course, though, there were also a myriad GOSTs as to how the specific controls may look, a GOST for every detail one could use in a device.

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      Just because the technology is there and cheaper does not mean that humans can push aside their physiological limitations in a critical situation.

      Have you considered the shareholders though?

    • PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      Id settle just for a truck that isnt very clearly pandering “im a big boy!” energy. There all way too fucking big for no god damn reason other than validation of ego. Bunch of weak fucking man babies need some million ton 3 lane wide truck just so they can pretend theyre a big strong man to themselves and everyone else, despite never using the truck for what its purpose is supposed to be.

      • Guy Dudeman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        18 days ago

        YES! Where is my dad’s little Toyota Pickup? Closest thing we have is the Ford Maverick, which is still pretty fucking huge.

        • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          18 days ago

          Indeed, Nissan should respond with their e-Power hybrid too. Toyota applied for a patent using the Stout name in South America.

        • PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 days ago

          Was always a fan of the tacoma they were making before they increased the size of it, thing was kind of the perfect size. Roomy enough cabin, small enough to be drivable in a parking lot, enough bed for towing occasionally.

      • Kethal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        I have heard that the reason for this is that trucks in that size range are less regulated by the EPA. Companies didn’t want to put in the research to develop trucks that met emissions standards, so they just make them really heavy for no purpose, evading regulations. Take this with a grain of salt, because I’ve done zero research of my own on it.

        • NoFuckingWaynado@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          I think any truck gets a pass. Even a Honda Civic raised an inch or two, slap a bigger greenhouse on it, and send it on it’s way as a CUV.

          I suspect the growth spurt has more to do with “tax loophole trucks.” I might be wrong on both points.

      • mohammed_alibi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        Maybe a Ford Maverick or a Honda Ridgeline. The other trucks are just unreasonable. $80K for a Tundra, or $60K for a Tacoma? WTF!!!

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    19 days ago

    I just want a coffee table book with pictures of these stupid executive’s faces who approved the original all touchscreen versions that were becoming ubiquitous.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      19 days ago

      You could make money from that. Trace the execs, get nice shiny photos to the tech, write some good copy, and publish “The Encyclopaedia of garbage tech” so that people in the future can ridicule and possibly learn from their stupidity.

    • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      19 days ago

      Having worked with people in that industry they don’t care. They always just want to shake things up then move to next thing to say they did something at their old job. Then forget all about it once they did the next thing.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 days ago

      woody_harrelson_wiping_tears_with_cash.jpg

      Touch screens are cheaper, that’s why they did it.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      I want to see some videos of salesmen trying to sell touchscreens like they are cars of the future and so great. Followed by the same salesman selling the return to tactile buttons as a big step forward because of how bad of an idea the touchscreens are.

      Most likely the first one will be older, but I bet there’s many that could be lead to do both in the same day by two different people showing interest in the same model but different year of a vehicle.

      • Snapz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        Plenty of responsibility for elmo, but don’t remove shared blame from the many layers of individual greedy cowards beyond that who used this as convenient cover to approve changes in their own org’s designs. Anything to make their extra pennies and not pass any of those savings on to the consumer (also so much easier to enable subscription car features, can’t make a physical button disappear over the air)

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    No I wouldn’t say touchscreens are out, I would say augmenting them with physical buttons is about to get popular.

  • Subtracty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    18 days ago

    Plotnick, an associate professor of cinema and media studies at Indiana University in Bloomington, is the leading expert on buttons and how people interact with them.

    I like that being a leading expert on buttons is a profession that exists in this world. You go Rachel Plotnick.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 days ago

      I’m just shocked that’s a cinema and media studies professor. I’d’ve expected human factors engineering or psychology, especially at such a psych school

      • EpeeGnome@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 days ago

        Professors don’t always teach in their actual area of expertise. I had a German language professor whose PhD was in Philosophy and activity published in that field, in English, German and French journals. It does seem like an odd combination, but probably not a lot of students signing up for a class in usability of buttons, even from the fields you would expect to study them .

  • seaQueue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    19 days ago

    Finally. Are they actually hiring decent UX folks this time or are they using the people who designed 1980s VCR programming UIs again?

  • Babalugats@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    Touch screens are shit tor buttons. They can be hacked. They can be unresponsive.

    There’s a load of other reasons, but either or both are enough to realise that a physical button is much safer. Perfect example of safety being lost in technology. Just because we can, doesn’t mean we should.