Sorry if this is a dumb question, but does anyone else feel like technology - specifically consumer tech - kinda peaked over a decade ago? I’m 37, and I remember being awed between like 2011 and 2014 with phones, voice assistants, smart home devices, and what websites were capable of. Now it seems like much of this stuff either hasn’t improved all that much, or is straight up worse than it used to be. Am I crazy? Have I just been out of the market for this stuff for too long?

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Feature per dollar possibly yes. Technology itself not necessarily.

    The issue is the market was much more competitive 10+ years ago which led to rapid innovation and the need for rivals to keep up.

    Today that no longer exists in so many areas so a lot of existing tech has stagnated heavily.

    For example, Google Maps was a very solid platform in 2014 bringing in a ton of new navigation features and map generation tech.

    Today, the most solid consumer map nav is probably Tesla’s map which utilizes Valhalla, a very powerful open source routing engine, that’s also used on openstreetmap and OSMAnd.

    This is a very huge improvement from 2014 Google Maps.

    Except the most used map app is still essentially 2014 Google Maps because Google cornered the market so they no longer have any need to innovate or keep up. In fact it’s actually worse since they keep removing or breaking features every update in an attempt to lower their cloud running costs.

    You can apply this to a lot of tech markets. Android is so heavily owned by Google, no one can make a true competitor OS. Nintendo no longer needs to add big handheld features because the PSP no longer exists. Smart home devices run like total junk because everyone just plugs it into the same cloud backend to sell hardware. The de facto way to order things online is Amazon. Amazon is capable of shipping within a week, but chooses not to for free shipping to entice you into buying prime, and because they don’t have a significant competitor. Every PC sold is still spyware windows because every OEM gets deals with Microsoft to sell their OS package.

    Even though the hardware always improves, the final OEM can screw it all up by simply delivering an underwhelming product in a market they basically own, and people will buy because there is no other choice or competition to compare to.

  • Ⓜ3️⃣3️⃣ 🌌@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    59 minutes ago

    I somewhat agree: tech peaked just when it was high end and absolutely not relying on manufacturer’s cloud / subscription / customer portal enrollment … 😓

  • Shelbyeileen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Tech is better, but content is worse. I have a smart TV from 2014 that I’m gonna use until it’s dead. When a new technology comes out, it’s all about gaining market trust, so the product is built to last and has cool features (generally) without the ads and data theft. My TV doesn’t play ads, but still has all the tech I need. Anything it can’t do, my PS4 can.

  • Gemini24601@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    In my opinion, technology keeps improving, however that doesn’t necessarily mean that it’s getting better. I think innovation in technology peaked from the 2000s to the early 2010s, after this period however, it has continually become more and more “enshitified,” meaning that features no one wanted suddenly being added. For example, “ai coffee maker” (this is real), like who asked for this? Not to mention, not only is everything more bloated, but levels of privacy have decreased significantly; every aspect of your digital life is capitalized on for advertising. The early 2010s were simpler times.

  • LouNeko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 hours ago

    In my opinion as an engineer, methods like the VDI2206, VDI2221 or ISO9000 have done irreparable damage to human creativity. Yes, those methods work to generate profitable products, but by methodizing the creative process you have essentially created an echo chamber of ideas. Even if creativity is strongly encouraged by those methods in the early stages of development, the reality often looks different. A new idea brings new risks, a proven idea often brings calculable profits.
    In addition to that, thanks to the chinese, product life cycles have gotten incredibly short, meaning, that to generate a constant revenue stream, a new product must have finished development while the previous one hasn’t even reached it’s peak potential. As a consequence, new products have only marginal improvements because there is no time for R&D to discover bigger progressive technologies between generations. Furthermore the the previous generation is usually sold along side the next one, therefore a new product can not be so advanced as to make the previous one completely obsolete.

    If you really want to see this with your own eyes, get a bunch of old cassette players from the 90s from different manufacturers. If you take them apart you can easily see how different the approaches where to solve similar problems back in the day.

  • StayDoomed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I feel like smartphones + internet peaked about 10 years ago and has now steadily become enshittified. I have never used “google assistant” because it takes less time to just type something in to my phone or tap the setup for my alarm.

    So yes, definitely feel that way. Consumer tech had less bullshit masking as improvements ten years ago.

    • Homescool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      58 minutes ago

      Yes. Name one useful product Google has released in 15 years.

      I can think of one (assistant/gemini) but it actually gets worse every minute so it supports the main idea that shits lame for a while now.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Design wise, absolutely peaked in the 90s/2000s. Now everything looks like a copy of each other with uninspired designs across the board.

    In terms of what it has to offer, I personally don’t think so. Couldn’t imagine going back 10-20 years ago and not having a device like my Steam Deck that can play computer games on the go (laptop not included since when are you realistically pulling out a laptop on a drive when heading out for errands?) or having a laptop not as thin as my current laptop or even just the touchscreen feature. I also couldn’t imagine going back 20 years ago and not having a 1 or 2 TB portable external hard drive (or if they were out, being a lot more expensive than now).

    • PetteriPano@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The PSP is 20 years old now. Absolutely massive game library, and definitely on par with the console and PC games at the time.

      The game library is well worth revisiting on something like a retroid pocked with upscaling.

  • Saltarello@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Tech has definitely become worse since megacorps killed the little guys & sucked the fun out of everything. Open source & self hosting is becoming/has become the only way. So glad I taught myself how to do it

  • QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    137
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    To quote one of my favorite authors:


    “I’ve come up with a set of rules that describe our reactions to technologies:
    1. Anything that is in the world when you’re born is normal and ordinary and is just a natural part of the way the world works.
    2. Anything that’s invented between when you’re fifteen and thirty-five is new and exciting and revolutionary and you can probably get a career in it.
    3. Anything invented after you’re thirty-five is against the natural order of things.”


    ― Douglas Adams, The Salmon of Doubt: Hitchhiking the Galaxy One Last Time

      • QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Man, the toys invented around that time are the best… But that’s probably all you’re really paying attention to at that point.

        And for kids now? Well they have things like Skibidi Toilet to keep them occupied.

        But for a more serious answer I think that’s when they’re in their most creative mindset and everything is new to them and they’re learning how things work.

        Obviously the exact age at which someone starts to take an interest in tech is going to be different from person to person. For me, I was a fan of reading popular science magazines at a younger age as well as manuals on all of the different setting/functions/features of operating systems…

  • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think new tech is still great, I think the issue is the business around that tech has gotten worse in the past decade

    • Redredme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      The question op is posing is:

      Which new tech?

      In the decade op’s talking about everything was new. The last ten years nothing is new and all just rehash and refinements.

      ML, AI, VR, AR, cloud, saas, self driving cars (hahahaha) everything “new” is over a decade old.

  • Platypus@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Not really, one of my favourite games of all time came recently and it wouldn’t be possible to exist without more current tech plus I like modern phones more and more

  • secret300@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    I’m 22 and I feel the same way. 2012-2014 PC hardware was better and I do not care what anyone says. It’s probably the software that was better but damn nowadays my 6 core 12 threaded CPU feels so ass in any task compared to my old ass Pentium. I have 32 gigs of RAM and shit can still be slow and unresponsive. Games are poorly optimized because they just focus on making it pretty but it barely looks better. Best example is counter strike 2 vs CS:GO. I played csgo on integrated graphics then on a 1050ti game was always smooth and looked good. Now CS2 looks blurry even with taa off. Runs like shit and sure it looks better but not that much better for it to run how it does.

    Edit: another example is vermintide 2. I upgraded my hardware since I played the 1st one but it runs way worse than the 1st one.

    I used to customize my desktop like crazy with the dumbest 3D effects. I was on a Pentium using Ubuntu 14.04, integrated graphics. Now I can’t run discord and 3D effects without noticing the difference in performance.

    Software is getting worse. Because it’s getting more and more complex. Now even basic things back then are rough to do now.

    I don’t have proof or know enough to prove it but I can feel it.