• federal reverse@feddit.orgM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    Not jumping to foregone conclusions is a good idea, no matter how likely a particular actor is, imo. And it’s quite likely that we’ll have to accept a degree of uncertainty for years. The Nord Stream sabotage wasn’t fully resolved either so far.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      As the others already said, it’s most probably russia, they just threatened to do it and no one else have the motive. But also I said, who even cares? and still you have to respond a pre made text about uncertainty.

      No thanks.

      Also, no one is talking about the north stream pipeline (and no one cares at all about it, may it disappear), changing rhe goalpoasts is another bad actor technique, just saying.

      • federal reverse@feddit.orgM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        it’s most probably russia

        It is likely. But the way this thread developed, people were simply jumping to conclusions. I don’t like these reflexive accusations.

        pre made text

        Huh? No, it was written in the moment.

        changing rhe goalpoasts is another bad actor technique, just saying.

        I just referred to the obvious example for another high-seas sabotage action that wasn’t fully resolved yet, from the same war. The reason for that was to illustrate that it may take a while to see through spin.

        Not sure which goal posts you think were moved by this.