• ILikeTraaaains@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    I would add that if isa News website, the 1000 words article is just a verbatim copy from Reuters.

    I want more info about [something happening], not to read the same article with minimal information again and again.

  • grte@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    Eh…This is a little rose coloured glasses. Anyone else remember the pre-adblock era of umpteen pop-up ads?

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      8 days ago

      A crummy history of ads on the internet:

      Starts out mostly used in formal fields and universities. Very usable!

      Businesses get on board and start the horrible ad infestation, leading to scammers and popup hell duw to misuse of a feature.

      Ad blockers start to reign in that shit, and the better browsers kill the popup infestation at the source. Pretty darn usable at this point, except for internet explorer.

      Google, an ad company, decides to make a browser so they can do all the malicious advertising and tracking on the backend.

      uBlock Origin is too effective at blocking the browser based tracking and advertising so google decided to do the manifest 3 or whatever that bullshit is called to openly force ads onto users.

      Based on history, I expect chrome to die a slow death due to the backlash from the manifest crap, but could be wrong since people are apparently fine with ads being forced into streaming services.

      • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        I think the difference is that there is not really a Netflix-without-the-ads alternative for the same price. And if you are willing to pay a bit more, well, you can just pay for the higher tier of Netflix without ads.

        With browsers on the other hand, it’s all free with virtually no barrier to switching. So I think people will defect away a lot more quickly when a browser starts to worsen in quality (especially since Chrome doesn’t have Daddy Microsoft to force users to use it by default)

    • macniel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      pop-up ads? Ha… try pop-UNDER ads.

      also can’t have ads when there is no javascript to begin with. Just static content.

            • macniel@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              Hyperlinks and Forms are static, yet they allow for interactivity (communication with the server and or url handler like mailto:, tel:, fax: etc.)

              iframes, frames (and framesets) were a fricking mistake. And that malicious practice with meta refresh yeah, that certainly was a thing back then. I loved when internet explorer just clicked on every navigation…

              img tags, are not advertisements, or what do you mean? since you probably don’t mean <img/>

              also, you can edit your commit so that you don’t have to spam comments.

              • Rain World: Slugcat Game@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 days ago

                different point -> different comment?
                also ads technically are anything that promotes a product? i’m not using the definition of “visible malware added to a website”

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 days ago

      I think this entire response thread is too young. Back when you connected to the Internet with 14.4k and 28k modems (mid to late 90’s), websites were as OP described. Simply put, there was no bandwidth for too much extra crap.

    • simple@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Not to mention the internet wasn’t as secure as it is now. There was lots of malicious code everywhere. Oh, and if you write a typo in any website’s name there was a 50/50 chance you’ll be redirected to porn.

    • Rooskie91@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      Came here to say this. They make a joke about how many adds are on the Internet in an episode of Futurama that aired in 2000.

    • Rusty@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I remember using internet in mid to late 90s and there were no ads, maybe OP means that period?

  • _bcron_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Also:

    Endless redirects that attempt to keep you on the site when you want to nope right out and click the back button

  • ngn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    the biggest mistake of humanity was (and still is) javascript

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 days ago

    Missed the half-dozen boilerplate SEO sites that scraped the most generic and unhelpful information possible that feature links to whatever barely tangential software or product they might be selling.

  • rmuk@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    Are Temu the ones who say “pretend you’re a billionaire” or something but their ads always have the most bizarre, undesirable-looking, nasty, cheap, plastic things in them?

  • NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    I think the best way to make the Internet less sh*tty is to get away from Google search.

    I like the SearX search engine. It gives old-school, relevant search results, not google ranked ones.

    https://search.inetol.net/

    It’s also spread out over many separate instances, so you can pick the one that best suits your search needs:

    https://searx.space/

    • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      I switched to DuckDuckGo a while back and even that was beneficial. I can always tell when I’m on a different machine and I forget to switch the default search… It’s wild how fast they’ve fallen.

      These days I setup ollama with open webui to host my own ai. Then you can connect Searxng to that and have the AI search the web for you and return no nonsense results.

  • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Ad-blocker dedectors

    buy crap you don’t needed

    Inrelevant information

    SO MANY ADS, INRELEVANT INFORMATION, TRACKERS

  • serenissi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    Apart from usual ubo, reader mode and friends trained eyes are very effective content filter. We all can glance on a search result page or an article and immediately know if it’s content or low effort craps.

    Stay out of mainstream social media, stop consuming ‘feeds’. Stay in the realms of personal sites, blogs and sane link aggregators/rss to keep mental peace of not having to filter garbage with eyes everyday.