• vzq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Overhead transmission lines are so 1950s.

    Invest in your country.

      • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 days ago

        Japan is slowly burying all their overhead lines into the sidewalks. A lot of urban streets look so much nicer now than they did 10 years ago.

        It’s probably no worse in an earthquake than the water mains, which would inherently be a lot more rigid than cables with intentional slack built into every segment.

    • Vilian@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Investing on your country would be connecting more people to electricity not make the sky look better

      • vzq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        The sky looking better is just one thing. No more blackouts when there’s winds or thunderstorms or just stray branches is the real perk.

    • sharkfinsoup@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      There are benefits of overhead lines. They are cheaper to install, maintain, and repair. Diagnosing problems are much easier as well. They’re certainly uglier and easier to damage but you don’t have to dig up the road to fix them.

      Newer cities shouldn’t install overhead lines but to have old cities with overhead lines switch to underground ones is very expensive and takes a lot of time, something smaller cities likely don’t have the budget for.

      • DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        You don’t have to dig up the roads to fix buried power lines any more than you have to tear up your walls to replace power lines in your house: you install a conduit (basically a pipe) under the road once and if the cable somehow gets damaged and needs to be replaced you can just run new cable through the existing conduit by simply pushing it in on one end and pulling from the other.

        Transformers and other non-cable equipment are typically housed aboveground in little boxes or built in to the house, so they’re actually easier to maintain than if they were installed aboveground on a pole since you don’t need a cherrypicker to access it.

        Obviously in a less wealthy small town with existing overhead infrastructure it doesn’t make much sense to move it all underground “just because”, but if you’re already trenching under the road to install water/sewage/gas mains, it won’t cost much extra to throw down an additional one or two smaller conduits for running power cables or telephone/cable/fiber lines.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      Have you heard of under ground power cables? Or of not that, a slightly neater organization of power cables?

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    Welcome to Mexico, er have such beautiful cities! Except for the 3623516582 cables everywhere

    • Glitterbomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Honestly, to me the ironic part is the power lines in this artwork are unappealing to me because of the artist not the subject matter. It seems they don’t know what all the lines are or where they go or how they work, so when I look at it and do know what it’s supposed to look like, this just looks like a mess that makes zero sense. The artist has created some sort of electrical fire hazard.

  • Lasherz12@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    I think clean power lines look nice. I’d definitely prefer them to a butterfly killing roadway or lighted poles that create light pollution and confuse wildlife.